Friday, July 3, 2020

Post 18: Krashen Theory for Second Language Acquisition (5 hypothesis)


Today´s topic "Krashen Theory for Second Language Acquisition (5 hypothesis)", 


Image taken from: http://optimizingimmersion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/67aea35b7ff8a9f58c143c6a331cf2ca.jpg



Second language learning

Krashen believes that there is no fundamental difference between the way we acquire our first language and our subsequent languages. He claims that humans have an innate ability that guides the language learning process. Infants learn their mother tongue simply by listening attentively to spoken language that is (made) meaningful to them. Foreign languages are acquired in the same way.

Krashen synthesizes his theories of second/foreign language learning in what is usually referred to as the Monitor Model.

The Monitor Model has 5 components:


Imagen taken from: http://image.slidesharecdn.com/themonitormodel-111029154558-phpapp01/95/the-monitor-model-2-728.jpg?cb=1319903192


The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

There are two ways of developing language ability: by acquisition and by learning. Acquisition is a sub-conscious process, as in the case of a child learning its own language or an adult 'picking up' a second language simply by living and working in a foreign country. Learning is the conscious process of developing a foreign language through language lessons and a focus on the grammatical features of that language.


The Natural Order Hypothesis

Language is acquired in a predictable order by all learners. This order does not depend on the apparent simplicity or complexity of the grammatical features involved. The natural order of acquisition cannot be influenced by direct teaching of features that the learner is not yet ready to acquire.


The Monitor Hypothesis

We are able to use what we have learned (in Krashen's sense) about the rules of a language in monitoring (or self-correcting) our language output. Clearly, this is possible in the correction of written work. It is much more difficult when engaging in regular talk.


The Input Hypothesis

We acquire language in one way only: when we are exposed to input (written or spoken language) that is comprehensible to us. Comprehensible input is the necessary but also sufficient condition for language acquisition to take place. It requires no effort on the part of the learner.


The Affective Filter Hypothesis

Comprehensible input will not result in language acquisition if that input is filtered out before it can reach the brain's language processing faculties. The filtering may occur because of anxiety, poor self-esteem or low motivation.


Visit this blog, which talks more about Krashen's hypothesis
Take a look at these slides for extra information

Stephen Krashen's Input Model (or Monitor Model )
The following information was taken from: http://esl.fis.edu/teachers/support/krashen.htm

Day 23: The influence of linguistic environment in SLA

Image taken from:http://blog.iqmatrix.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/linguistic-intelligence-mind-map.jpg

 The influence of linguistic environment  in SLA

In this Prezi, the authors discuss the importance of the Noticing Hypothesis in the linguistic environment and the acquisition of a second language.
 
Also, this Slideshare PowerPoint Presentation, is going to cover the topic and present the Output and Input Hypotheses. 

POST #15 The Critical Period Hypothesis

OBJECTIVE:

  • Students present about The Critical Period Hypothesis and The Influence of L1 on the Acquisition of L2.
  • Students will answer a test on Popular Ideas about Language Learning


I. THE CRITICAL PERIOD HYPOTHESIS
Retrieved from criticalperiodhtypothesis.blogspot.com  



This is a great link for more information on the topic. Here you can access the Johnson and Newport (1989) studies for reading.

Does age affect the acquisition of a language?


Lennerberg Critical Period Hypothesis

Genie Wileys's case "Feral Child"

Check out the group's presentation here

HOMEWORK:

  • Check this blog entry.
  • Get ready for APA workshop next week.